Institutional Formats and Political Action Patterns of Subnational Industry Federations in 30 Years of Redemocratisation (1988-2018)
DOI:
10.46551/issn.2527-2551v20n2p.108-131Keywords:
Patterns of monitoring, Subnational industry federations, Legislative Process, Political ProfessionalizationAbstract
This article analyzes the patterns of monitoring of the legislative process carried out by the subnational Federações da Indústria (Industry Federations), seeking to identify the changes in their institutional formats in the years following the redemocratization. In view of the quality of the internal organization of these entities it evaluates a process of political professionalization, defined by the systematicity, rootedness and transparency of their actions. In view of this, the internal organization of the Federations was verified, evaluating their follow-up structure and not the "success" of their positioning in relation to the legislative. In addition to the description of the organization and the trajectories of the subnational Federações da Indústria, five of them were emphasized, one per region of the country, in order to examine their patterns of accompaniment. A research is presented in which an attempt was made to describe comparatively the organization for the follow-up of the subnational legislative process, defining their patterns of action. The hypothesis suggests that there was a process of political professionalization of the Federações in the years after the redemocratization, which, through this evaluation, can be verified, although in a non-homogeneous way. Thus, if the hypothesis is confirmed, at least in part, it points to the need for a more careful evaluation of the causes of the changes in their institutional formats.
Downloads
References
ABRÚCIO, F. L. O ultrapresidencialismo estadual. In: ANDRADE, Regis de Castro (org.). Processo de Governo no Município e no Estado. São Paulo: EdUSP, 1998. p. 87-116.
ALCÁNTARA-SÁEZ, M. A. A profissionalização da política. CURITIBA: CPOPPPGCP/UFPR. 2016.
ALCÁNTARA-SÁEZ, M. Political career and political capital. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, nº 73. Ciudad de México, p. 1-17, 2017.
BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C.; DINIZ, E. Empresariado Industrial, Democracia e Poder Político. Novos Estudos – CEBRAP, São Paulo, nº.84, p.83-99, 2009.
COSTA, P. R. N. Democracia nos anos 50: burguesia comercial, corporativismo e parlamento. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1998.
COSTA, P. R. N. Empresariado e democracia no Brasil (1984 - 1994). [s.l.] Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2003.
COSTA, P. R. N.; BORCK, I. S. S. F. Empresariado industrial e Legislativo: a Agenda Legislativa da CNI (2010-2017). ANPOCS. Anais...Caxambú: 41o Encontro Anual da Anpocs, 2017.
DAZA, J. D. La institucionalización partidista: una propuesta de abordaje de las
estructuras organizativas partidistas. Estudios Políticos. Nº 27. Medellín, p. 103-127, 2005.
HEDLUND, R. D.; PATZELT, W. J.; OLSON, D. M. Capacity Building in Parliaments and Legislatures: Institutionalization, Professionalization and Evolutionary Institutionalism. In: International Political Science Association Conference, 2008. Quebec, 2008.
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, 2012.
LEOPOLDI, M. A. P. Política e interesses na industrialização brasileira: as associações industriais, política econômica e o Estado. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2000.
LEOPOLDI, M. A. P. O difícil caminho do meio: Estado, burguesia industrial e industrialização no segundo governo Vargas (1951-1954). In: SZMRECSÁNYI, T.; SUZIGAN, W. História econômica do Brasil contemporâneo, São Paulo: Hucitec/Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em História Econômica/EdUSP/Imprensa Oficial, 2002, p. 31-77.
LIJPHART, A. Grupos de interesse: pluralismo versus corporativismo. In:_______. Modelos de democracia: desempenho e padrões de governo em 36 países. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2011, p. 197-209.
MAHONEY, J.; THELEN, K. Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science. In: MAHONEY, J.; THELEN, K. (eds.). Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, p. 3-36.
MANCUSO, W. P. O lobby da indústria no Congresso Nacional: empresariado e política no Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: EdUsp, 2007.
OFFERLÉ, M. Los oficios, la profesión y la vocación de la política. PolHis, Mar del Plata, ano 4, n. 7, p. 84-99, 2011.
PANEBIANCO, A. Modelos de Partido: organização e poder nos partidos políticos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.
PIERSON, P. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Association, v. 94 n. 2, p. 251-267, 2000.
POLSBY, N. W. A institucionalização da Câmara dos Deputados dos Estados Unidos. Revista de Sociologia e Política. Curitiba, v. 16, n. 30, p. 221-251, 2008.
SCHMITTER. P. C. Still the Century of Corporatism? The Review of Politics, v. 36, nº. 1, pp. 85-131, 1974.
SCHNEIDER, B. R. Encontro da Latin American Studies Association. The State and Collective Action: Business Politics in Latin America. Anais...1998.
SQUIRE, P. Legislative Professionalization and Membership in State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, v. 17, p. 69-79, 1992.
WATERS, M. Collegiality, bureaucratization, and professionalization: A Weberian analysis. American Journal of Sociology, v. 94, nº 5, p. 945–972, 1989.
WEBER, M. A política como vocação. In: GERTH, H.H.; WRIGHT MILLS, C. (orgs). Max Weber – Ensaios de Sociologia. Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos, 1967. p. 55-89.
.png)
.png){kind=logo}
