Integrating Environmental Sustainability into Macroeconomic Frameworks: The Eco-Keynesian Cross
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46551/epp2024v12n0107
DOI:
10.46551/epp2024v12n0107Keywords:
Ecological Macroeconomics, eco-Keynesian cross, ecological macroeconomic policies, rebound effectAbstract
The ecological transition hinges on ecological structural change, necessitating smart macroeconomic policies. Incorporating ecological considerations into macroeconomic modelling constitutes a pivotal area of inquiry that examines the nexus between environmental sustainability and economic expansion. This article proposes a macroeconomic modelling to establish a foundational analytical framework to address this challenge. Incorporating ecological considerations into macroeconomic modelling constitutes a pivotal area of inquiry that examines the nexus between environmental sustainability and economic expansion. Contributing to the post-Keynesian Ecological Macroeconomics field, this paper proposes an eco-Keynesian cross due to its simplicity and widespreadness for teaching macroeconomics to illustrate the macroeconomic perspective of green targets strategies in a closed economy. Green public and private investments have the potential to enhance output through the multiplier effect and improve environmental efficiency. However, these investments may also induce rebound effects, resulting in a net increase in pollution intensity within the economy. The model underscores the potential trade-off between social and environmental objectives, which an ecological perspective seeks to surmount by advocating for sustainable and inclusive industrial development.
Downloads
References
Althouse, J., Guarini, G., & Porcile, J. G. (2020). Ecological macroeconomics in the open economy: Sustainability, unequal exchange and policy coordination in a centre-periphery model. Ecological Economics, 172, 106628.
Andreoni, A., & Chang, H.-J. (2019). The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48, 136–150.
Annicchiarico, B., & Di Dio, F. (2015). Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 69, 1–21.
Baland, J.-M., Bardhan, P., & Bowles, S. (2007). Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability. Princeton University Press.
Barker, T., Dagoumas, A., & Rubin, J. (2009). The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Energy Efficiency, 2, 411–427.
Batini, N., Di Serio, M., Fragetta, M., Melina, G., & Waldron, A. (2022). Building back better: How big are green spending multipliers? Ecological Economics, 193, 107305.
Chenavaz, R. Y., Dimitrov, S., & Figge, F. (2021). When does eco-efficiency rebound or backfire? An analytical model. European Journal of Operational Research, 290(2), 687–700.
Commoner, B. (1972). The Environmental Cost of Economic. Population, Resources, and the Environment, 3, 339.
Deleidi, M., Iafrate, F., & Levrero, E. S. (2023). Government investment fiscal multipliers: evidence from Euro-area countries. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 27(2), 331–349.
Dimitropoulos, J. (2007). Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: An overview of the state of knowledge. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6354–6363.
ECLAC. (2012). Structural change for equality: an integrated approach to development.
Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Amann, C. (2001). Beyond IPAT and Kuznets curves: globalization as a vital factor in analysing the environmental impact of socio-economic metabolism. Population and Environment, 23, 7–47.
Fontana, G., & Sawyer, M. (2013). Post-Keynesian and Kaleckian thoughts on ecological macroeconomics. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 10(2), 256–267.
Guarini, G. (2020). The macroeconomic impact of the Porter hypothesis: sustainability and environmental policies in a post-Keynesian model. Review of Political Economy, 32(1), 30–48.
Guarini, G., & Oreiro, J. L. (2022). Ecological Transition and Structural Change: A Developmentalist Analysis. Working Papers PKWP2223, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
Guarini, G., & Oreiro, J. L. (2023). Ecological transition and structural change: A new-developmentalist analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 90, 101727.
Guarini, G., & Porcile, G. (2016). Sustainability in a post-Keynesian growth model for an open economy. Ecological Economics, 126, 14–22.
Hardt, L., & O’Neill, D. W. (2017). Ecological macroeconomic models: assessing current developments. Ecological Economics, 134, 198–211.
Huang, J., Yu, H., Dai, A., Wei, Y., & Kang, L. (2017). Drylands face potential threat under 2 C global warming target. Nature Climate Change, 7(6), 417–422.
Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 291–316.
Kassouri, Y., Bilgili, F., & Peter Majok Garang, A. (2022). Are government energy technology research, development, and demonstration budgets converging or diverging? Insights from OECD countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(5), 563–577.
Mazzucato, M. (2015). The green entrepreneurial state. Routledge London.
Meckling, J., Aldy, J. E., Kotchen, M. J., Carley, S., Esty, D. C., Raymond, P. A., Tonkonogy, B., Harper, C., Sawyer, G., & Sweatman, J. (2022). Busting the myths around public investment in clean energy. Nature Energy, 7(7), 563–565.
Naqvi, A., & Stockhammer, E. (2018). Directed technological change in a post-Keynesian ecological macromodel. Ecological Economics, 154, 168–188.
Nawaz, M. A., Hussain, M. S., Kamran, H. W., Ehsanullah, S., Maheen, R., & Shair, F. (2021). Trilemma association of energy consumption, carbon emission, and economic growth of BRICS and OECD regions: quantile regression estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 16014–16028.
OECD. (2011). Towards green growth: monitoring progress. OECD: Paris, France.
Ren, S., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2022). How does green investment affect environmental pollution? Evidence from China. Environmental and Resource Economics, 81, 25–51.
Rezai, A., Taylor, L., & Mechler, R. (2013). Ecological macroeconomics: An application to climate change. Ecological Economics, 85, 69–76.
Saccone, D., Della Posta, P., Marelli, E., & Signorelli, M. (2022). Public investment multipliers by functions of government: An empirical analysis for European countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 60, 531–545.
Saes, B. M., & Romeiro, A. R. (2019). Ecological macroeconomics: a methodological review. Economia e Sociedade, 28, 365–392.
Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518.
Schreiner, L., & Madlener, R. (2021). A pathway to green growth? Macroeconomic impacts of power grid infrastructure investments in Germany. Energy Policy, 156, 112289.
Spash, C. L., & Schandl, H. (2009). Growth, the Environment and Keynes: Reflections on two heterodox schools of thought.
Ukaogo, P. O., Ewuzie, U., & Onwuka, C. V. (2020). Environmental pollution: causes, effects, and the remedies. In Microorganisms for sustainable environment and health (pp. 419–429). Elsevier.
UNIDO. (2013). Lima Declaration: Towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development. Date of Access, 12, 2019.
Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2011). Environment versus growth—A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth.” Ecological Economics, 70(5), 881–890.
Victor, P. A. (2012). Growth, degrowth and climate change: A scenario analysis. Ecological Economics, 84, 206–212.
Wenlong, Z., Tien, N. H., Sibghatullah, A., Asih, D., Soelton, M., & Ramli, Y. (2023). Impact of energy efficiency, technology innovation, institutional quality, and trade openness on greenhouse gas emissions in ten Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 43024–43039.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Economics and Public Policies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os trabalhos publicados não serão remunerados em hipótese alguma.
O (s) autor (es), ao submeterem o trabalho à análise, automaticamente cedem os direitos de publicação à Revista, em sua versão eletrônica. e/ou impressa (A revista também será impressa e depositada em algumas bibliotecas de referência) licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Os autores dos trabalhos aprovados NÃO terão direito a qualquer exemplar da edição em que constar sua publicação, pois trata-se de versão eletrônica.
Serão aceitos trabalhos com, no máximo, três autores.
Todos os casos não previstos serão analisados e decididos pelo Conselho Editorial que, dentre outras atribuições, ficará encarregada de informar aos autores da possibilidade da publicação, contra os quais não caberá recurso.