The interpretation in Martin Heidegger

Between the as hermeneutic and the apophantic

Abstract

I propose to think of the conception of interpretation (Auslegung) in Martin Heidegger as an exposition of the real in the articulation of the hermeneutic and apophantic dimensions of "as-structure", which he expounded mainly in paragraphs 32 and 33 of Being and Time.Auslegung is composed by the preposition "aus", which means movement to go out, and "legung", from the verb "legen", means by, that is, the interpretation is the put of the real, its presentation, as a hermeneutic meeting, which opens the presence in its horizon of possibilities of being and of the apophantic, a condition of possibility of predication, formalization of the entities and of communication. This exposition in a meaningful order is oriented in the way in which entities appear on the horizon of the as hermeneutic, showing reality in its meaning and thus revealing the sense of being of presence, whose way of being projected in possibilities takes place in the articulation of the interpretation and in its formal exposition. Thus, when the human presence interprets, it exposes itself in the way it understands to be in a significant conjuncture, an exposition that occurs in a modal form, which is the temporalization itself, revealing that presence is a mode of being of time that resumes the past of various modes projecting themselves into possible futures from the present embodiment. How, however, does the interpretation in the structure lie as? In what way are they constituted and what brings together the apophantic and the hermeneutic, and, by bringing together, does it make it possible to differentiate interpretations? What does interpreting mean to Heidegger?